Book Review – Simple Church – by Thom S. Rainer & Eric Geiger
The experience of this book was a rollercoaster ride. I initially bought the book simply because of the title: Simple Church. We just moved to Las Vegas, NV to start a simple church network and in many ways we have NO idea what we are doing! We believe the philosophy behind what we want to do is pretty solid, but when it comes to the how, we are pretty clueless. We are attempting to do something that we’ve never been a part of. So, the title of the book drew me in. I thought it would give us a solid leg up on how to start a simple church network. It did not. However, it was still a very helpful book for me.
As I began reading the book, I was immediately confronted with the fact that this book is written for established churches that “do church” from a traditional perspective with buildings, multiple paid staff, large budgets, many programs, and lots of people and programs already in place. We are not in that situation as we still only have the four people who originally moved here to start this church planting movement. Once more, we don’t intend to become a church organization with a building, paid staff, etc. We desire to grow through a simple house church network organically. So, immediately within the first two chapters, I was disappointed that I bought the book and it was not what I expected.
I determined to keep reading it anyway and found it to be quite useful nonetheless. Here are few positives and negatives from my perspective…the bad news first:
- If your definition of simple church = house church or organic church, then be warned that this book is not a “how to” manual for getting your network going.
- While this book does identify a major problem in our churches today…that they are complex and ineffective as a result, it does not in my mind take the reader far enough into the problem. I believe the way churches are typically run are complex even when Rainer and Geiger’s advice is followed. It is a good first step to simplify the entire process of making disciples, but the complexity runs much deeper than just the program level of the church. It extends to church budgets, buildings and professional staff. I don’t believe the first Christians ever envisioned the church as an economic giant as we have here in America in the 21st century. The greatest percentage of our time and resources are spent just keeping the organization running from a legal and business perspective. Believe me, I know…and we JUST started. Identifying the complexity problem and committing to fix it runs deeper than Rainer and Geiger acknowledge in this book.
- It seems that numerical growth is the main concern. I know Rainer and Geiger would say it is not and that making disciples is. However, church life is not always simple. Sometimes its members require discipline or even exclusion. Numerical growth is not all important in these instances. The health of the body is at risk when cancerous individuals are allowed to continue in it. It may be that they just refuse to comment on the subject because it is outside the scope of this book’s purpose, but it is certainly something to keep in mind while reading.
Now for the good:
- Even if you are trying to start a simple/house/organic church network you still need to have a plan. This book will help you keep that plan simple. We thought our plan was pretty simple, but turns out it needed to be simplified even more. The four words that Rainer and Geiger repeat over and over again are Clarity, Movement, Alignment & Focus. We needed work in each of those areas and this book is helping us move towards simplicity in all of them. This is a great time to do so, because, as the book mentions, the longer you’ve been in existence, the more difficult it is to simplify. What better time than at the beginning!
- We are urged to simplify down to our ultimate objective…developing followers of Jesus Christ. All our plans and processes need to fall in line and work towards that objective. Everything else must go.
- We were challenged to improve our clarity. We had a simple stated mission, but a simple mission statement does nothing for you if you don’t make it clear to everyone involved. Already the only ones who could probably tell you the mission statement were my church planting partner, Andrew, and myself. Our wives probably can’t tell you what it is unless they look it up on the website. Everyone needs to be clear where they are going, so we need to constantly talk about and clarify where we are going.
- Movement is also key. We have lots of ideas as to how to minister to our community in Las Vegas, and how to make disciples, but we don’t have an organized process for how to lead someone from a casual observer to a fully devoted follower of Jesus Christ. Simple steps to the process are needed. The process needs to be visual and a clear invitation must be made to the next step in the process for those who want to go. We must be proactive about moving people through the process and not just assume it will happen.
- The book challenged our focus. Again, we have many good ideas, but ultimately our focus needs to be on following Christ and leading others to do the same. Adding more programs, events, plans, etc. will not necessarily help. Most of the time more is actually less. More stuff activity can detract from the process. Be willing to say “no” to stuff that doesn’t develop followers of Christ. Be willing to eliminate stuff you are already doing if it isn’t part of the simple process of making disciples.
Overall, I recommend the book. It is worth a read. This is the first book I’ve read that would be of significant help to established churches. They are not offering another model, but a solution to a major problem (complexity) in our churches today. It can also be helpful for the house church network leader in terms of developing a strategy, but you must bear in mind that this book is not specifically directed towards that model in spite of the title.
April 9, 2008 at 7:02 pm
[...] Ondine wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerptThe experience of this book was a rollercoaster ride. I initially bought the book simply because of the title: Simple Church. We just moved to Las Vegas, NV to start a simple church network and in many ways we have NO idea what we are … [...]
April 10, 2008 at 2:58 am
Hi, Matt
Thanks for the review. Your church plant sounds really interesting. I suppose you’ve written more about it, but I’m not sure how to find it. Our church is kind of interested in small groups, but nothing much seems to be happening. I really do believe that the life of the church is in intimate relationships.
I wonder about the pros and cons of a small group based church with no central authority. On the one hand, there’s no one with any real power to do anything (or even to know) if a group falls into heresy (though by God’s grace we certainly have ample access to pure doctrine in the USA if we only take advantage of it.) On the other hand, there’s no central authority to fall into heresy itself and drag the church along with it.
There are other considerations, too, of course, but it is certainly something to think about. I hadn’t heard of anyone else in this country doing what you’re doing. Maybe I’m really behind in the news. Is this some sort of a movement?
Cindy
April 10, 2008 at 6:28 am
Hey Cindy,
Glad to have you back!
We are not the first to go the simple church route in the USA. There is and has been a movement in that direction for quite some time now. It is mostly the younger generation who are tired of going to church just to say they did. They want their faith to be real and they want to live it out in community every day! I believe that within the next 20 years the house church movement will become quite noticeable in the USA.
As for our church, we are just starting out. We moved to Vegas in January of this year. My wife and daughter and I moved along with another couple and their daughter from Texas. We felt the Lord was calling us here. In many ways we are still trying to figure things out as we go. We’ve never had this type of ministry modeled for us, so it isn’t natural. We just believe it will be used by God to make many disciples for his kingdom.
Our church plant’s website is http://www.ineobible.org. Some of our strategy and whatnot is up there if you are really interested in seeing what all of our dreams. I wouldn’t put too much stock in what we say at this point as we are still in the infancy stages. Talk to me in 3-5 years and we’ll see if what we have to say has any value!
As far as where the authority is based it is only in Jesus Christ, the head of the church. Heresy happens in the best churches every day. Jesus promised HE would build his church. That is not to say methods and strategies aren’t important at all (we obviously think they are), but ultimately the church is more spiritual than physical. We tend to place too much trust in our control and not enough trust in the one who has control!
However, we do share your concern. We are not sure what lies ahead, but a look at church history provides a glimpse into the fact that the house church movement has been very successful. In fact the church was entirely house church based for nearly 300 years up until the time of Constantine when he made Christianity the state religion.
In any case, please do pray for us. We need it!
Grace and Peace,
matt
April 10, 2008 at 4:58 pm
Hey, Matt
It’s snowing here again, which is why I’m not at work yet. I haven’t decided whether to go. We’re right on the line between northern and southern hills, and the northern hills are predicted to get 1-2 feet of snow this afternoon. I have an evening class . . . what to do? You should check out the photo on the blog post I put up yesterday. Those same ducks are swimming right through a slush coat of ice on our pond this morning.
I’m excited about this house church thing. You’re right that young people don’t seem to be interested in going to a traditional church, and honestly I can’t blame them. It doesn’t speak to their lives to sit in a congretation and listen to a message and never have any personal relationships involved. It doesn’t speak to my life, either.
The good thing about traditional churches is the pooling of resources and people to do things that wouldn’t be possible with the limited number of people who could be involved in any one house church. The problem is that the traditional church takes so long to move. Things have to be approved by the board, and maybe by people higher up than them, and so on. If you have a limited time opportunity for an outreach, for example, you may not be able to access the resources in that time–so what good are they?
Then, even if a project can tolerate the time needed for approval, frequently the people who were excited about it are no longer interested by the time the thing grinds through the bureocracy.
The thing I loved about church when I was growing up was all the social interaction. My folks always had people over for parties, we’d get together to go do maintenance on the children’s home our denomination funded, the adults went on mission trips together, my parents took the youth group on trips and so on. I wonder if a lot of the missionary stuff that’s been done over the years could have been accomplished by a decentralized network of house churches?
Forgive me–I guess I’m just musing out loud. I like the idea of a central church that is an extension of house churches rather than the other way around. Like Willow Creek maybe. I haven’t been there, but I’ve been reading about them. Problem is, centralized churches aren’t generally interested in becoming subservient to their house churches. I don’t know what the answers are, but it’s great to be able to discuss it with someone.
TTYL,
Cindy
April 10, 2008 at 8:23 pm
Hey Cindy,
I’m so glad to not live where it snows. It barely rains here either, but I don’t mind rain so much. I grew up in WI and got plenty of snow. I’m so glad I didn’t live there this winter. They got over 100 inches of snow where my parents live! That set an all time record…significant for WI folks who see lots of snow every year anyway! Whenever it snowed in TX, I stayed home. I am confident while driving in snow, but the rest of the Texans are clueless…and it’s very dangerous. Not worth it!
“It doesn’t speak to their lives to sit in a congretation and listen to a message and never have any personal relationships involved. It doesn’t speak to my life, either.” – Yah, we’ve somehow lost touch with how to edify one another actively in our worship and fellowship together. We’ve resigned ourselves to allowing one person’s spiritual gifts (usually the preacher or worship leader) be the only influence on our lives. What a tragedy. We were meant for community from the beginning. I don’t have anything against large churches in general, but I think they need to find a way to get people into vibrant small groups where there is a family atmosphere. It’s very difficult to do in established churches. People want to stay passive observers rather than let other Christians into their lives. That’s frustrating.
You make a lot of great points about the pros and cons of traditional church. One of the biggest cons of traditional church is that people have two things set in their mind: 1) Church is a place you go. 2) We pay the pastor to do the work of the ministry.
Both mindsets are SO damaging. Church is not a place you go…it’s who you ARE! Therefore we must wrestle with how to BE the church every day. The idea of professional Christians is closely related. I have no problem with pastors being paid…it’s actually biblical. However, in the USA we’ve taken it to such an extreme that Christians believe they have no responsibility to carry out the work of the ministry because they are not paid to do so…that’s not what they went to school for. The problem is that if you are a believer, you are called to the ministry. No exceptions. That ministry will look different in each situation, but make no mistake, Christ called all who would believe to follow him. It is impossible to follow him without making ministry an everyday affair for each Christian.
“I wonder if a lot of the missionary stuff that’s been done over the years could have been accomplished by a decentralized network of house churches?” – I’ll bet you (figuratively of course…not Vegas style!) much of it has been done by house church networks. This will be more evident in the next several decades, I believe.
I tend to muse out loud as well, but I hope you and others find this a good place to do so. I enjoy it. It is encouraging to me…hopefully to you and others as well.
Keep thinking!
Grace and Peace,
matt
April 11, 2008 at 4:38 am
You are right–people do want to stay passive observers. One of my really, really big pet peeves. It’s a tragedy in the true sense of the word. Our tragic flaw of not entering in to ministry personally keeps us from true intimacy with Christ and with one another.
Lets do be the church!
God’s strength,
Cindy
April 15, 2008 at 9:51 pm
Would you send me information on your network in Nevada. I know someone moving there and may be interested.
My email is jeoffsrib at hotmail dot com
Thanks
May 12, 2008 at 5:13 pm
I agree with the idea of simplicity, but I have some questions. Is it possible that you are trying to manipulate people into being the the church through organization or lack of it? Is it not the power of the Holy Spirit working through the Word that accomplishes this????? If the word of God is shared with clarity, adhere to in everyday life, trusted, God blesses in spite of organization. He is the one who makes the church the church. He said, “I will build by church.” And Cindy the intimate relationship with Jesus Christ precedes mininistry and true fellowship. How can a person lead where he/she has never been? How can you share what you nothing about?
May 12, 2008 at 10:08 pm
Larry,
Thanks for stopping by and for commenting!
I’m not exactly sure how to respond to your questions. Your questions have a ring of solid disagreement with me, but based on your questions, I think we probably agree on more things than we disagree in regards to the church.
It is definitely possible that we are manipulating people to do things “our” way. That is somewhat unavoidable in this sin-cursed world. We are, however, sincerely trying to operate according to the model Scripture gives us. If we interpret it incorrectly in any way, then obviously we are manipulating people to do things our way instead of according to God’s Word. Please pray for us that we would not be like that. We really do want to follow God’s plan for his church.
I’ve argued that Christ will build his church in support of our method. Everyone who is involved in any kind of church “organization” uses that statement in support of the way they do things. It’s not enough to simply quote that, we must be willing to allow him to do so.
Sharing the Word of God with clarity is extremely important, but I’ve been involved with churches of various different sizes where the Word of God was shared with extreme clarity, yet the lives of the supposed Christians within those organizations were not affected in the least during the other 6 days of the week. We indeed have to trust and adhere to the Word in order for it to make a difference. We believe that people are less likely to slip through the cracks when groups are small/simple than when they slip in and out of their pew along with 1,000 other people ever Sunday morning.
God does bless his church in spite of our organization (or lack thereof), but not when we are ignoring clear Scripture mandates. I think sometimes the complexity of church organizations can be in direct conflict and working against the spiritual element of the body of Christ.
I disagree with your statement to Cindy in part. From a worldly perspective, leading where you have not gone seems like a foolish idea, but our only example needs to be the one that Christ himself modeled. So long as Cindy is following Christ, then it matters little where she’s been before or what kind of leadership experience she has. Christ didn’t call us to lead. He called us to follow…HIM. He told us that if we want to be the greatest, then we need to be the lowest servant of all…just like HIM. If no one around her is following Christ in that way, but she is ready to follow his example, then she MUST follow him. She has no other alternative. She must be willing to follow Christ regardless of whether or not her family and friends are along for the ride.
Grace and Peace,
matt